|
The
most significant and innovative energy solution in decades.
Completely changing the global energy and climate debates.
Use
off-peak wind energy for power to recycle
waste CO2 into transportation fuels.
This could cut CO2 emissions In half by mid-century.
At
$10/MWhr for off-peak wind energy, the cost of
the energy needed (at practical efficiencies)
to make gasoline or jet fuel from CO2 and
water will be less than $0.75/gal – and
only $0.50/gal for ethanol.

|
|
Dr.
Doty will be presenting three talks at the ASME conference
in San Francisco, California on July 19-23, 2009. The
abstracts can be viewed by clicking the links below.
Energy Sustainability
ASME-Abstract-WindFuels - "Securing
our Transportation Future by Using Off-peak Wind
to Recycle CO2 into Fuels"
ASME-Abstract-DORC - "A
Dual-source Organic Rankine Cycle (DORC)
for Improved Efficiency in Conversion
of Low- and Mid-grade Heat Sources"
Heat Transfer
ASME-Abstract-Recuperator - "Compact,
High-effectiveness, Gas-to-gas Compound Recuperator
with Liquid Intermediary (CRLI)"
|
Fact
check: Storing very large amounts of energy in compressed
air is 5,000 times more expensive
than
in liquid fuels. Read
more.
A Tale of Two Crises: We
are facing an energy crisis that could potentially devastate
the
world’s economy as global oil supply peaks. We are
also facing the unparalleled threat of global warming.
These crises are greater than any society has ever faced
before, and they are entwined… The energy crisis could
be postponed (at great cost) by relying on shale oil, tar
sands and
coal-to-liquids, but that will dramatically worsen the environmental
crisis.
There are certain avenues that can be followed that might
help reduce
global warming but would dramatically worsen the energy crisis
(ban the use of coal and natural
gas power plants).
We present WindFuels,
offering a completely new direction for solving both crises
simultaneously. Using off-peak
wind energy (wind in the middle of the night, when the grid doesn’t
need it, so it’s very cheap), we can
efficiently and competitively recycle the exhausted
CO2 from
coal and natural gas power plants into fuels that work with today’s
transportation infrastructure. These competitive fuels will eventually
provide enough supply to lower fuel prices and end the energy
crisis, while eliminating the consumption of fossil oil, tar
sands, shale oil, and coal-to-liquids; dramatically reducing
greenhouse gas emissions while improving both the local and global
economy. When the WindFuels are burned, no new carbon
will be released. WindFuels are
carbon-neutral.
No experienced chemist has
doubted that it is possible to convert CO2 into standard
fuels (like gasoline and ethanol), or that the theoretical
limit to the efficiency of doing this
is probably between 75% and 90%. The problem has been that
prior proposals for doing this conversion have had efficiencies
of only 25% to 35%. In other words, the chemical
energy in the liquid fuels produced
would be
only 30% of the input energy required, and that input
energy would be mostly electrical, which is expensive – except
for a few hours in the middle of the night.
The combination
of the eight major technical advances we have made over the
past two years will
now permit this conversion
to be done at 60% efficiency. That’s high enough efficiency
for carbon-neutral fuels made from waste CO2 to easily
compete with petroleum (the fact that the cost of petroleum has
increased
3-4 fold since we started working on this has helped as well),
especially when the input energy is from wind. These
processes have been simulated in great detail, and are absolutely
sound. Hundreds of distinguished
scientists
and
engineers
have
reviewed
the materials on this website, and no significant technical problems
have yet been identified.
Our breakthroughs permit production
of carbon-neutral ethanol, gasoline, and many chemicals from
waste CO2 and
off-peak (cheap) wind energy that will be competitive in the
open market.

An average acre of land
in the Dakotas, Kansas, or Wyoming will produce at least five
times as much alcohols from wind, water,
and waste CO2 as an average acre of land in fertile farming areas
devoted to biofuels.
Serious
about Sustainability. Successful civilizations have
always planned carefully for the
future – not just of their children or grandchildren, but
for their great-great-grandchildren. Today, we are “fiddling...,
and arranging chairs on the deck”, while an energy catastrophe
looms that will dwarf the financial meltdown and depression of
2008 if we don’t begin taking it seriously. This impending
catastrophe is not just for our children, or our grandchildren,
but even for us.
Everyone has heard a lot over the past
six years about (global) peak
oil, and within the past year
the DOE has finally accepted
that peak oil is coming decades sooner than they were saying
just a few years ago. We expect peak oil in 2013. That doesn’t
mean global oil production will drop sharply after 2013, but
even a very slow decline rate will send prices soaring. The $147/bbl
we saw in mid-2008 will look cheap by 2012. It’s true that
Canada theoretically has enough tar
sands to forestall peak oil
for several more decades and the U.S. has lots of oil
shale,
but these resources won’t be developed fast enough – partly
for environmental reasons.
On those occasions over the
past 5 years when natural gas prices spiked, we heard some prophets
warning that North America would
see peak gas within 10 to 20 years;
but then the price would drop and the need to think about peak
gas would be forgotten.
Analysis of official IEA data now indicates global peak gas is
likely around 2025. As we approach peak gas, its price too will
go through the ceiling and force us to adjust our usage to meet
the declining production.
Almost no one has heard of peak
coal or peak
uranium – because
the DOE continues to say we won’t run out for more than
a century. However, the recent research by Prof. David Rutledge
(Caltech) shows that global coal resources have been greatly
overstated, and others have shown the same is true of economically
recoverable uranium reserves.
It’s true, we have enough coal in the U.S. to last us
at least 80 years at our current usage rate (1.1 Gt/yr). However,
the combined coal production of China, Europe, India, and Japan
was 75% of their coal consumption in 2006, and it will be less
than half of their consumption in 2013. They will then be importing
over twice as much coal as they are today. By 2020, they will
all happily pay 20 times what they were paying a few years ago
to keep their lights on. (The exporters will charge that much
because the impending peak gas and peak coal will be undeniable.)
If the importers will pay that much, we won’t pay much
less in the U.S. Global peak coal can be expected around 2035,
and peak uranium will come before 2045.
We may take some comfort in
knowing that because
of peak oil (2013), peak
gas (2025), and peak coal (2035), total carbon emissions over
the next five decades will be much less than even the low-emissions
scenarios of the IPCC reports. But this is small comfort, as
2 trillion tons of land ice have been lost since 2003, and the
2008 Greenland
summer ice melt tripled the 2007 record. If
we do not start seriously working hard to avoid a cataclysmic
energy crisis, the impact will be additional calamity to the
planet and its people.
We saw in mid-2008 what can
happen when oil demand comes within 2% of oil supply capacity.
Imagine what would happen if oil,
gas, and coal demand were all within 1% of supply capacity!
Billions of people would be starving. The world would be in complete
chaos.
This doomsday scenario is not necessary, but the current efforts
toward sustainability are not nearly sufficient to avoid it.
Changing the global energy infrastructure will take decades of
major commitments.
We’ve taken some hard looks at
the serious limitations of the current efforts toward sustainable
alternatives on this
website, and we have explained why WindFuels offers our best
hope for a transition toward a sustainable, prosperous future.
WindFuels will be over 90% carbon neutral, and they are completely
sustainable. When the last coal power plants are shut down in
2070, the needed CO2 will come from biofuels refineries, cement
factories, steel mills, and the atmosphere.
We hope you’ll
begin by spending a few hours studying the research we’ve
presented on this website. Then let your Senators and Representatives
know that what is currently being done toward
sustainability is not nearly enough to avoid oil price shock
by 2013 and a global catastrophe by 2018, but Doty Energy has
a plan that will work.
The sooner we begin
directing resources toward WindFuels plants, the
sooner we can rest assured that our transportation
fuel, agriculture, civilization, and climate are
secure for future generations.
F.
David Doty

|
|
 |

Most
recent update 6/16/09
|
| |
An
important new paper
" Securing Our Energy Future by
Efficiently Recycling CO2 into
Transportation Fuels – and Driving the Off-peak Wind Market"
was presented at and published in the proceedings of WindPower 2009
May 4-7, 2009, Chicago IL USA. |
| |
| For
those of you who aren't scientists or engineers,
we have a WindFuels
primer,
to help introduce the more technical concepts. |
| |

(We
are using off-peak wind energy because
it is the most cost effective renewable power
source
in the
United States. In some countries,
another renewable energy source like solar
or geo-thermal
would be
more appropriate.)
|
|
First: Use
off peak wind energy to power electrolysis
to break H2O (water) into H2
(hydrogen) and O2 (oxygen). |
|
Next: Using the reverse
water gas shift (RWGS), react
some of the H2 with CO2 to
convert it to CO (carbon monoxide) and water.
|

RWGS
And FTS Plant
|
Then: Use
FTS (Fischer-Tropsch Synthesis). H2 from
the electrolysis and CO from the reverse water
gas shift are fed into our Renewable
Fischer-Tropsch Synthesis (RFTS) chemical plant
where they are processed into fuels.
|
|
| |
Zero
net emissions!
Most competitive fuels!
Most climate benefit!
Energy storage solved!
Most scalable!
Zero waste!
No biomass!.
No grid connectivity issues!
No hype.
|
How expensive
must oil be for WindFuels to compete?
In most cases about
$60/bbl, but in some cases only $40/bbl. |
| |
| For
those that are interested in a very detailed
design summary (and simultaneously interested
in helping us to fund continued development),
the "RFTS-DetailedDesign-1" can
be purchased in hard-copy. |
| |
“They
shall beat their swords into plough shares,
and their spears into pruning hooks... Neither
shall
they learn
war anymore...”
- Isaiah 2:4
“We will convert
CO2, water, and air into fuels,
chemicals, and fertilizers – and
do it on a time scale that will save the planet.”
- David Doty
(obviously not a poet)
|
So
you don’t
believe cellulosic
ethanol will be over $5.00/gal
by 2013?
Have you looked at the hyperinflation in wood pellets over the past three years? |
| Why
is 60% system net
efficiency something to get excited
about? The bottom line beats any other renewable fuel
by a very wide margin. |
| We simply
can’t cut CO2 emissions in half by mid-century
without carbon-neutral transportation fuels that
are cheaper than heavy oil products. |
| |
Don’t
believe WindFuels can compete with products from
tar sands?
Take a look at where we see
heavy oil going. |
| |
| We
can shift the geopolitical center for energy from
the Middle
East to North America. We can go from importing oil to exporting carbon-neutral
fuels and chemicals in 35 years. |
|
  |